PFAS Water Contamination

The Environmental Litigation Group (ELG) currently represents hundreds of public entities and individuals whose water supplies are contaminated with chemicals known as per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. This is a family of chemicals used to create nonstick, stain resistant, and waterproof products as well as industrial products including certain fire-fighting foams. Several companies made PFAS-containing products despite knowing that toxic PFAS compounds would be released into the environment when used by customers as instructed and intended.

PFAS is a class of thousands of man-made chemical compounds known as per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances. The most notorious of these are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), two chemicals used to create many nonstick, stain resistant, and waterproof products. These are also the chemicals used in the manufacturing of aqueous film-forming foam, or AFFF, a fire-fighting agent used to fight fires in many locations world-wide, including military bases, airports, petroleum refineries, industrial facilities, fire departments, and fire training centers.

Because of environmental and human health concerns, manufacturers ceased production of PFOS in 2002; manufacturers likewise agreed to stop producing PFOA in 2006.

Once released into the environment through dispersal or improper disposal of a product, PFAS persist in the environment. These compounds are water-soluble and do not readily adsorb into sediments or soil; they tend to stay in the water column. Because these chemicals resist breaking down, scientists have found them globally — in water, soil, and air as well as in human food supplies, breast milk, umbilical cord blood, and human blood serum. These chemicals are often referred to as “forever chemicals” because of their persistence in the environment. Both PFOA and PFOS are known animal carcinogens and are likely human carcinogens. Given their potential health risks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asked the manufacturers to reduce their use of these chemicals. EPA announced that it will soon regulate PFOA and PFOS in drinking water and recently issued Health Advisory Levels for PFOA (0.004 parts per trillion, or ppt) and PFOS (0.02 ppt) in drinking water.

AFFF manufacturers had the technology to produce AFFF with safer chemicals from as early as the 1960s. However, these manufacturers knowingly chose to make and sell AFFF with PFOA and PFOS. Cities, towns, and neighborhoods surrounding locations where AFFF was dispersed into the environment have reported contaminated groundwater and soil in their communities. Chemical manufacturers can be held liable for their negligence. Litigation against these companies has resulted in the recovery of billions of dollars, much of which has been applied toward the cost of cleanup efforts.

Dupont Settlement

Scott Summy, Shareholder of the Environmental Litigation Group, gives an overview of the $1.185 billion settlement Baron & Budd reached with Dupont for its contamination of public water systems with PFAS. Speaking to officials of the public water systems represented in the case, Scott provides history of the case, how payments will be used to meet the needs of public water systems, the various funds available based on need, how compensation will be calculated for public water systems, and more.

3M Settlement

Scott Summy, Shareholder of the Environmental Litigation Group, provides an overview of the historic $12.5 billion settlement Baron & Budd reached with 3M Company for its role in contaminating public water systems with PFAS. In the webinar, Scott shares the history of the case, how payments will be used to meet the needs of public water systems, how compensation will be calculated for public water systems, and more.